Supreme Court docket On Hijab Ban: The Supreme Court docket on Friday (09 August) has stayed the round banning the carrying of niqab, hijab, stole or cap in a university in Chembur, Mumbai. Now the following listening to of this case will probably be held within the third week of November. This ban was imposed by NG Acharya & DK Marathe School of Chembur, Mumbai, which was upheld by the Excessive Court docket on the idea of uniform code.
Whereas imposing the ban, the Supreme Court docket made it clear that carrying burqa within the school can’t be allowed. The bench of Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Sanjay Kumar additionally requested the school’s lawyer that whether it is in opposition to the show of non secular identification within the school, then has it additionally banned making use of tilak or bindi? The school mentioned that 441 Muslim women examine there. Out of them, solely 3 are adamant on carrying the veil within the school.
When and the way did the dispute begin?
The controversy started on Could 1, when NG Acharya and DK Marathe School of Chembur Trombay Training Society issued a discover on their official WhatsApp group, which included college members and college students. The discover outlined a costume code that banned the carrying of hijabs, niqabs, burqas, caps, badges and stoles on the school campus. The petitioners argued of their petition that the directive was issued with none authorized authority and is subsequently “inaccurate, void and invalid in legislation”.
When the school administration didn’t hear, the scholars went to the Excessive Court docket
The scholars initially approached the school administration and principal and requested them to raise the ban on hijab, niqab and burqa, citing their proper to alternative, respect and privateness at school. When their requests had been ignored, they raised the matter with the Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor of Mumbai College in addition to the College Grants Fee and sought intervention to supply training with none discrimination. Nevertheless, after receiving no response, the scholars filed a petition within the Bombay Excessive Court docket.
Through the listening to within the Excessive Court docket, Altaf Khan, the counsel for the petitioners, cited verses from the Quran to argue that carrying a hijab is a necessary a part of Islam. The petition mentioned that the school’s motion was “arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal and perverse”.
What did the school administration say?
The school administration defended the ban, saying that it was a measure to implement a uniform costume code and preserve self-discipline. It additionally denied any intention to discriminate in opposition to the Muslim neighborhood. Senior advocate Anil Anturkar, representing the school, mentioned that the costume code applies to college students of all religions and castes. After this, the court docket continued the keep. Then the matter reached the Supreme Court docket.
Additionally learn: ‘Creamy layer isn’t acceptable in reservation’, mentioned Athawale after getting assurance from PM on quota inside quota
